It is very important to check the performance if we use the new features of alternative methods of SQL Server. I have written earlier posts of the HierarchyId and CTE (Common Table expression). Now in this post you can view the usage of HierarchyId and CTE, comparisons between them. Go ahead with the object creation.
- Introduction to HierarchyId data type - Amazing feature of SQL Server 2008
- HierarchyId DataType in SQL Server 2008 - Get Level and String Path
-- Creating databse and tableInserting demo records in table created above.
CREATE DATABASE HierarchyDB
GO
USE HierarchyDB
GO
IF ( Object_id('HierarchyTab') > 0 )
DROP TABLE HierarchyTab
GO
CREATE TABLE HierarchyTab
(
NodeId INT NOT NULL
,NodeParent int
,NodeDepth VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL
,NodePath HIERARCHYID NULL
,NodeLevel as (NodePath.[GetLevel]())
,NodeDesc VARCHAR(100)
)
GO
ALTER TABLE HierarchyTab
ADD CONSTRAINT U_NodePath UNIQUE CLUSTERED (NodePath)
GO
INSERT INTO HierarchyTab(NodeId,NodeParent,NodeDepth,NodePath,NodeDesc)Now we will check the usage and execution plan of the HierarchyId and CTE.
VALUES
(1,NULL,'1',HIERARCHYID::Parse('/'),'Node-1'),
(2,1,'1.1',HIERARCHYID::Parse('/1/'),'Node-2'),
(3,2,'1.1.1',HIERARCHYID::Parse('/1/1/'),'Node-3'),
(4,2,'1.1.2',HIERARCHYID::Parse('/1/2/'),'Node-4'),
(5,1,'1.2',HIERARCHYID::Parse('/2/'),'Node-5'),
(6,5,'1.2.1',HIERARCHYID::Parse('/2/1/'),'Node-6'),
(7,5,'1.2.2',HIERARCHYID::Parse('/2/2/'),'Node-7'),
(8,7,'1.2.2.1',HIERARCHYID::Parse('/2/2/1/'),'Node-8'),
(9,8,'1.2.2.1.1',HIERARCHYID::Parse('/2/2/1/1/'),'Node-9')
GO
1. First, we will run the scripts for the to get data level by level order. Let’s start with CTE and the query without using a hierarchy node,
-- Using CTE (Not Using NodePath and NodeLevel)
;WITH cteLevels
AS
(
SELECT
NodeId as Node
,NodeParent as Perent
,NodeDepth as Depth
,0 AS [Level]
,NodeDesc as [Desc]
FROM HierarchyTab
WHERE NodeId = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT
NodeId
,NodeParent
,NodeDepth
,[Level] + 1 AS [Level]
,NodeDesc
FROM HierarchyTab
INNER JOIN cteLevels
ON ( NodeParent = Node )
)
select
*
from cteLevels
Order by [Level]
GO
Now running the script to get hierarchy data level by level order using HierarchyId,
-- With HierarchyId
SELECT
NodePath.ToString() AS NodeStringPath,
NodeId,
NodeParent,
NodeDepth,
NodeLevel,
NodeDesc
FROM HierarchyTab
Order by NodeLevel
GO
Before going ahead with next script, we are checking the execution plan of both above script,
2. Getting records of hierarchy in hierarchical order with CTE and HierarchyId.
-- Using CTE (Not Using NodePath and NodeLevel)
;WITH cteLevels
AS
(
SELECT
NodeId as Node
,NodeParent as Perent
,NodeDepth as Depth
,0 AS [Level]
,NodeDesc as [Desc]
,CAST(NodeId AS VARCHAR(MAX)) AS [Order]
FROM HierarchyTab
WHERE NodeId = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT
NodeId
,NodeParent
,NodeDepth
,[Level] + 1 AS [Level]
,NodeDesc
,[Order] + '.' + CAST(NodeId AS VARCHAR(MAX)) AS [Order]
FROM HierarchyTab
INNER JOIN cteLevels
ON ( NodeParent = Node )
)
SELECT
*
FROM cteLevels
ORDER BY [Order]
GO
View the result of hierarchical order data with running below query with HierarhyId,
-- With HierarchyId
SELECT
NodePath.ToString() AS NodeStringPath,
NodeId,
NodeParent,
NodeDepth,
NodeLevel,
NodeDesc
FROM HierarchyTab
Order by NodePath
GO
Finally, we go through the performance and the execution plan review of both above scripts,
This is just the details of execution and performance review.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please Use Good Leanguage